Stroboscopic observation of a random walker
R. Mansilla

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that for Gaussian random walkers, it is generally impossible to infer true motion patterns from stroboscopic observations, and that observed distance distributions depend heavily on observation intervals.
Contribution
It shows that real motion patterns cannot be recovered from stroboscopic data for Gaussian walkers and highlights the impact of observation intervals on distance distribution analysis.
Findings
Impossible to recover true motion patterns from stroboscopic data.
Distance distributions are highly dependent on observation time intervals.
Numerical experiments support these claims.
Abstract
The patterns of motion of mobile agents has received recently wide attention in the literature. There is a number of recent studies centered around the motion behavior of many agents ranging from albatrosses to human beings. Special attention has been given to the covered distances statistical distributions. In some cases, due to the lack of accurate data about the motion of the agents it has been necessary to plan very clever experiments to obtain them. These experiments try to infer the statistical properties of the agents' real motion from the observed positions in consecutive time intervals. The length of the time intervals is a random variable taking values from a previously known statistical distribution or from a distribution deduced from empirical data. The aim of this work is to demonstrate that for a Gaussian Random Walker it is, in general, impossible to recover the real…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDiffusion and Search Dynamics · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Primate Behavior and Ecology
