Unique perfect phylogeny is NP-hard
Michel Habib, Juraj Stacho

TL;DR
This paper proves that determining whether a given ternary phylogenetic tree is uniquely defined by a set of quartet subtrees is an NP-hard problem, confirming its computational complexity.
Contribution
It establishes the NP-hardness of the problem of verifying the uniqueness of a phylogenetic tree based on quartet data, answering a longstanding open question.
Findings
Proves the NP-hardness of the unique perfect phylogeny problem
Confirms computational difficulty in phylogenetic tree reconstruction
Addresses a question posed by Mike Steel in phylogenetics
Abstract
We answer, in the affirmative, the following question proposed by Mike Steel as a $100 challenge: "Is the following problem NP-hard? Given a ternary phylogenetic X-tree T and a collection Q of quartet subtrees on X, is T the only tree that displays Q ?"
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgorithms and Data Compression · Genome Rearrangement Algorithms · Advanced Graph Theory Research
