Comparing natural volume forms on GL_n
Huber Annette, Soergel Wolfgang

TL;DR
This paper compares two natural volume forms on the algebraic group GL_n over Q, providing an explicit formula for their ratio, which enhances understanding of their relationship in algebraic geometry.
Contribution
It explicitly computes the comparison factor between the integral form and the product of primitive classes on GL_n, clarifying their relationship.
Findings
Derived an explicit formula for the ratio of the two volume forms.
Clarified the relationship between algebraic de Rham cohomology and integral forms.
Enhanced understanding of natural volume forms on algebraic groups.
Abstract
There are two natural choices for a volume form on the algebraic group Gl_n over Q: the first is the integral form (unique up to sign), the other is the product of the primitive classes in algebraic de Rham cohomology. We work out the explicit comparision factor between the two.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
