The closure of a sheet is not always a union of sheets
Michael Bulois

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that in the context of algebraic group actions, specifically for semisimple groups acting on their Lie algebras, the closure of a G-sheet may not always be a union of sheets, countering common assumptions.
Contribution
It provides explicit examples showing that the closure of a G-sheet can fail to be a union of sheets in the adjoint action setting.
Findings
Counterexamples of sheets with non-union closures
Clarification of the behavior of G-sheets under closure
Insight into the structure of algebraic group actions
Abstract
In this note we answer to a frequently asked question. If G is an algebraic group acting on a variety V, a G-sheet of V is an irreducible component of V^(m), the set of elements of V whose G-orbit has dimension m. We focus on the case of the adjoint action of a semisimple group on its Lie algebra. We give two families of examples of sheets whose closure is not a union of sheets in this setting.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Finite Group Theory Research
