Localized vs. delocalized character of charge carriers in LaAlO3/ SrTiO3 superlattices
Kejin Zhou, Milan Radovic, Justine Schlappa, Vladimir Strocov, Ruggero, Frison, Joel Mesot, Luc Patthey, and Thorsten Schmitt

TL;DR
This study uses resonant inelastic X-ray scattering to distinguish between localized and delocalized charge carriers in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 superlattices, clarifying discrepancies in carrier density measurements.
Contribution
It demonstrates a direct method to identify carrier types in oxide heterostructures and explains the origin of different carrier behaviors.
Findings
Presence of both localized and delocalized Ti 3d carriers.
Oxygen vacancies cause localized carriers.
Electron transfer at the interface causes delocalized carriers.
Abstract
Understanding the nature of electrical conductivity, superconductivity and magnetism between layers of oxides is of immense importance for the design of electronic devices employing oxide heterostructures. We demonstrate that resonant inelastic X-ray scattering can be applied to directly probe the carriers in oxide heterostructures. Our investigation on epitaxially grown LaAlO3/SrTiO3 superlattices unambiguously reveals the presence of both localized and delocalized Ti 3d carriers. These two types of carriers are caused by oxygen vacancies and electron transfer due to the polar discontinuity at the interface. This result allows explaining the reported discrepancy between theoretically calculated and experimentally measured carrier density values in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
