
TL;DR
This paper reviews recent advances in understanding the mass scales, formation processes, and evolution of Population III stars, highlighting differences between primordial and preionized gas star formation and discussing implications for early universe galaxy formation.
Contribution
It provides an updated synthesis of numerical and analytical models of Pop III star formation, including the first direct calculations of the Pop III.1 initial mass function and insights into binary fragmentation.
Findings
Pop III.1 stars are likely more massive than Pop III.2 stars.
Different Pop III types have distinct supernova and black hole formation pathways.
Recent simulations show evidence for binary fragmentation at high densities.
Abstract
We provide a status report on our current understanding of the mass scales for Pop III.1 and Pop III.2 stars. Since the last review (Norman 2008), substantial progress has been made both numerically and analytically on the late stages of protostellar cloud core collapse, protostar formation and accretion, and stellar evolution taking into account cloud core properties and radiative feedback effects. Based on this, there are growing indications that primordial stars forming from purely cosmological initial conditions (Pop III.1) were substantially more massive than stars forming in preionized gas (Pop III.2) where HD cooling is important. Different stellar endpoints are predicted for these two types of Pop III stars with different chemical enrichment signatures: the former die as pair instability supernovae or intermediate mass black holes, whereas the latter die as iron core-collapse…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
