Separation between coherent and turbulent fluctuations. What can we learn from the Empirical Mode Decomposition?
Nicolas Mazellier, Fabrice Foucher

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of Empirical Mode Decomposition in separating turbulent velocity signals from perturbations, proposing a criterion and rejection method to recover original signals with high accuracy, especially for mono-component and broad-range perturbations.
Contribution
It introduces a new resemblance criterion and a rejection procedure for Empirical Mode Decomposition to effectively distinguish and recover turbulent signals from perturbations.
Findings
High accuracy in recovering signals with mono-component perturbations.
Effective separation of signals even with broad-range perturbations.
Discrepancies occur when perturbation frequencies overlap energy-containing eddies.
Abstract
The performances of a new data processing technique, namely the Empirical Mode Decomposition, are evaluated on a fully developed turbulent velocity signal perturbed by a numerical forcing which mimics a long-period flapping. First, we introduce a "resemblance" criterion to discriminate between the polluted and the unpolluted modes extracted from the perturbed velocity signal by means of the Empirical Mode Decomposition algorithm. A rejection procedure, playing, somehow, the role of a high-pass filter, is then designed in order to infer the original velocity signal from the perturbed one. The quality of this recovering procedure is extensively evaluated in the case of a "mono-component" perturbation (sine wave) by varying both the amplitude and the frequency of the perturbation. An excellent agreement between the recovered and the reference velocity signals is found, even though some…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
