
TL;DR
This study analyzes high-quality galactic rotation curves from THINGS to test MOND, finding that the simple interpolating function fits best and that the derived acceleration parameter aligns with previous estimates, supporting MOND's viability.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed analysis of 12 galaxy rotation curves using MOND, confirming the consistency of the acceleration parameter and stellar mass-to-light ratios with prior findings and stellar models.
Findings
The simple interpolating function yields better fits than the standard one.
The median a0 value is consistent with previous studies.
MOND fits are excellent for 75% of the sample when distance is free.
Abstract
We present the analysis of 12 high-resolution galactic rotation curves from The HI Nearby Galaxy Survey (THINGS) in the context of modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND). These rotation curves were selected to be the most reliable for mass modelling, and they are the highest quality rotation curves currently available for a sample of galaxies spanning a wide range of luminosities. We fit the rotation curves with the "simple" and "standard" interpolating functions of MOND, and we find that the "simple" function yields better results. We also redetermine the value of a0, and find a median value very close to the one determined in previous studies, a0 = (1.22 +- 0.33) x 10^{-8} cm/s^2. Leaving the distance as a free parameter within the uncertainty of its best independently determined value leads to excellent quality fits for 75% of the sample. Among the three exceptions, two are also known to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
