Can accretion disk properties observationally distinguish black holes from naked singularities?
Z. Kovacs, T. Harko

TL;DR
This paper explores how accretion disk properties around rotating naked singularities differ from those around Kerr black holes, proposing observational signatures to distinguish these hypothetical objects from black holes.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of accretion disks around rotating naked singularities and Kerr black holes, highlighting unique observational signatures.
Findings
Energy flux around naked singularities can be much higher than around black holes.
Conversion efficiency of accretion into radiation is greater for naked singularities.
Distinct frame dragging effects differentiate the two classes of objects.
Abstract
Naked singularities are hypothetical astrophysical objects, characterized by a gravitational singularity without an event horizon. Penrose has proposed a conjecture, according to which there exists a cosmic censor who forbids the occurrence of naked singularities. Distinguishing between astrophysical black holes and naked singularities is a major challenge for present day observational astronomy. A possibility of differentiating naked singularities from black holes is through the comparative study of thin accretion disks properties around rotating naked singularities and Kerr-type black holes, respectively. In the present paper, we consider accretion disks around rotating naked singularities, obtained as solutions of the field equations in the Einstein-massless scalar field theory. A first major difference between rotating naked singularities and Kerr black holes is in the frame…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
