A Comparison of Methods for Determining the Molecular Content of Model Galaxies
Mark R. Krumholz, Nickolay Y. Gnedin

TL;DR
This paper compares a complex chemistry and radiative transfer method with a simple analytic approximation for determining molecular gas in galaxies, finding good agreement at higher metallicities and suggesting the simpler method as a cost-effective alternative.
Contribution
It demonstrates that a simple analytic approximation can reliably estimate molecular content in galaxies, reducing computational costs compared to complex models.
Findings
Good agreement between methods at metallicities >~10^-2 of Milky Way value.
Discrepancies increase at lower metallicities, possibly due to time-dependent effects.
Analytic approximation is a viable, low-cost alternative in many applications.
Abstract
Recent observations indicate that star formation occurs only in the molecular phase of a galaxy's interstellar medium. A realistic treatment of star formation in simulations and analytic models of galaxies therefore requires that one determine where the transition from the atomic to molecular gas occurs. In this paper we compare two methods for making this determination in cosmological simulations where the internal structures of molecular clouds are unresolved: a complex time-dependent chemistry network coupled to a radiative transfer calculation of the dissociating ultraviolet (UV) radiation field, and a simple time-independent analytic approximation. We show that these two methods produce excellent agreement at all metallicities >~10^-2 of the Milky Way value across a very wide range of UV fields. At lower metallicities the agreement is worse, likely because time-dependent effects…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
