Spectroscopic Study of the HST/ACS PEARS Emission-Line Galaxies
Lifang Xia (1), Sangeeta Malhotra (1), James Rhoads (1), Norbert, Pirzkal (2), Zhenya Zheng (1,3), Gerhardt Meurer (4), Amber Straughn (5),, Norman Grogin (6), David Floyd (7) ((1) Arizona State University, AZ, (2), Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD

TL;DR
This study uses spectroscopy to analyze 76 emission-line galaxies from the PEARS survey, confirming redshifts and identifying 7 AGNs through multiple methods, enhancing understanding of galaxy properties and AGN detection.
Contribution
It provides a spectroscopic validation of PEARS redshifts and introduces multiple methods for AGN identification in emission-line galaxies.
Findings
ACS grism redshifts have an accuracy of σ_z=0.006
Seven AGNs and candidates identified using X-ray, line ratios, and high-ionization lines
Spectroscopy confirms and refines galaxy and AGN classifications
Abstract
We present spectroscopy of 76 emission-line galaxies (ELGs) in CDF-S taken with the LDSS3 spectrograph on Magellan Telescope. These galaxies are selected to have emission lines with ACS grism data in the Hubble Space Telescope Probing Evolution and Reionization Spectroscopically (PEARS) grism Survey. The ACS grism spectra cover the wavelength range 6000-9700 \AA\ and most PEARS grism redshifts are based on a single emission line + photometric redshifts from broad-band colors; the Magellan spectra cover a wavelength range from 4000 {\AA} to 9000 {\AA}, and provide a check on redshifts derived from PEARS data. We find an accuracy of = 0.006 for the ACS grism redshifts with only one catastrophic outlier. We probe for AGN in our sample via several different methods. In total we find 7 AGNs and AGN candidates out of 76 galaxies. Two AGNs are identified from the X-ray full-band…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
