KamLAND-experiment and Soliton-like Nuclear Georeactor. Part 1. Comparison of Theory with Experiment
V.D. Rusov, D.A. Litvinov, S. Cht. Mavrodiev, E.P. Linnik, V.N., Vaschenko, T.N. Zelentsova, M.E. Beglaryan, V.A. Tarasov, S.A. Chernegenko,, V.P. Smolyar, P.O. Molchinikolov, K.K. Merkotan

TL;DR
This paper proposes a soliton-like nuclear georeactor at Earth's core boundary to explain KamLAND antineutrino data, estimating its location and heat power, and compares it with standard neutrino oscillation parameters.
Contribution
It introduces a novel georeactor hypothesis with a soliton-like model and correlates it with KamLAND and Borexino data, providing new insights into Earth's internal processes.
Findings
Theoretical spectra fit KamLAND data well under the georeactor hypothesis.
Estimated georeactor heat power is approximately 30 TW.
Parameters of neutrino mixing differ significantly from standard values.
Abstract
We give an alternative description of the data produced in the KamLAND experiment, assuming the existence of a natural nuclear reactor on the boundary of the liquid and solid phases of the Earth's core. Analyzing the uncertainty of antineutrino spectrum of georeactor origin, we show that the theoretical (which takes into account the soliton-like nuclear georeactor) total reactor antineutrino spectra describe with good accuracy the experimental KamLAND-data over the years of 2002-2007 and 2002-2009, respectively. At the same time the parameters of mixing ({\Delta}(m21)^2=2.5\cdot 10^-5 eV^2, tan^2{\theta}12=0.437) calculated within the framework of georeactor hypothesis substantially differ from the parameters of mixing ({\Delta}(m21)^2=7.49\cdot 10^-5 eV^2, tan^2{\theta}12=0.436) obtained in KamLAND-experiment for total exposure over the period of 2002-2009. By traingulation of KamLAND…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
