The Abundance of Molecular Hydrogen and its Correlation with Midplane Pressure in Galaxies: Non-Equilibrium, Turbulent, Chemical Models
Mordecai-Mark Mac Low, Simon C. O. Glover

TL;DR
This study uses non-equilibrium, turbulent chemical models to explain the observed correlation between molecular hydrogen abundance and midplane pressure in galaxies, highlighting the importance of time-dependent processes over equilibrium assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces a three-dimensional turbulent model including non-equilibrium chemistry that better explains molecular hydrogen formation and its correlation with galactic pressure than previous equilibrium models.
Findings
Time-dependent H_2 formation models match observed molecular fractions.
Turbulence increases molecular hydrogen abundance by a factor of a few.
Radiative dissociation is less significant due to self-shielding in diffuse radiation fields.
Abstract
Observations of spiral galaxies show a strong linear correlation between the ratio of molecular to atomic hydrogen surface density R_mol and midplane pressure. To explain this, we simulate three-dimensional, magnetized turbulence, including simplified treatments of non-equilibrium chemistry and the propagation of dissociating radiation, to follow the formation of H_2 from cold atomic gas. The formation time scale for H_2 is sufficiently long that equilibrium is not reached within the 20-30 Myr lifetimes of molecular clouds. The equilibrium balance between radiative dissociation and H_2 formation on dust grains fails to predict the time-dependent molecular fractions we find. A simple, time-dependent model of H_2 formation can reproduce the gross behavior, although turbulent density perturbations increase molecular fractions by a factor of few above it. In contradiction to equilibrium…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
