Shift of percolation thresholds for epidemic spread between static and dynamic small-world networks
J. K. Ochab, P. F. G\'ora

TL;DR
This study compares epidemic spread on static and dynamic small-world networks, revealing that network dynamics significantly lower percolation thresholds and effectively increase shortcut density, impacting epidemic behavior.
Contribution
It demonstrates how network dynamics alter epidemic thresholds and provides corrected analytical models for dynamic small-world networks.
Findings
Dynamic networks lower percolation thresholds by about 20%.
Epidemic behavior on dynamic networks resembles static networks with increased shortcuts.
Rewiring rate influences epidemic spread and thresholds.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare the epidemic spread on static and dynamic small-world networks. The network was constructed as a 2-dimensional Watts-Strogatz model (500x500 square lattice with additional shortcuts), and the dynamics involved rewiring shortcuts in every time step of the epidemic spread. The model of the epidemic is SIR with latency time of 3 time steps. The behaviour of the epidemic was checked over the range of shortcut probability per underlying bond 0-0.5. The quantity of interest was percolation threshold for the epidemic spread, for which numerical results were checked against an approximate analytical model. We find a significant lowering of percolation thresholds for the dynamic network in the parameter range given. The result shows that the behaviour of the epidemic on dynamic network is that of a static small world with the number of shortcuts increased by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
