Disk Galaxy Scaling Relations in the SFI++: Intrinsic Scatter and Applications
Amelie Saintonge (MPE), Kristine Spekkens (RMC)

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that using isophotal radii yields tighter scaling relations between galaxy size, luminosity, and rotation velocity in disk galaxies, enabling improved distance measurements and insights into galaxy formation.
Contribution
It introduces the use of isophotal radii for scaling relations, achieving unprecedentedly tight correlations and providing new constraints on galaxy formation models.
Findings
Isophotal radii produce significantly tighter size-luminosity and size-rotation velocity relations.
The intrinsic scatter in the relations is consistent with being constant above a certain velocity threshold.
The tight relations allow for accurate galaxy distance measurements and insights into halo spin parameters.
Abstract
We study the scaling relations between the luminosities, sizes, and rotation velocities of disk galaxies in the SFI++, with a focus on the size-luminosity (RL) and size-rotation velocity (RV) relations. Using isophotal radii instead of disk scale-lengths as a size indicator, we find relations that are significantly tighter than previously reported: the correlation coefficients of the template RL and RV relations are r=0.97 and r=0.85, which rival that of the more widely studied LV (Tully-Fisher) relation. The scatter in the SFI++ RL relation is 2.5-4 times smaller than previously reported for various samples, which we attribute to the reliability of isophotal radii relative to disk scale-lengths. After carefully accounting for all measurement errors, our scaling relation error budgets are consistent with a constant intrinsic scatter in the LV and RV relations for velocity widths…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
