Testing gravity using the growth of large scale structure in the Universe
Elise Jennings, Carlton M. Baugh, Silvia Pascoli

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the accuracy of current theoretical models for redshift space distortions in galaxy surveys, using large N-body simulations to distinguish between dark energy and modified gravity scenarios in the universe's expansion.
Contribution
It demonstrates that linear perturbation theory models poorly describe simulation results and introduces an improved model that accurately recovers the growth rate of structure.
Findings
Linear models give poor fit to simulation data
Incorrect models can cause systematic errors in interpretation
An improved model accurately recovers growth rates
Abstract
Future galaxy surveys hope to distinguish between the dark energy and modified gravity scenarios for the accelerating expansion of the Universe using the distortion of clustering in redshift space. The aim is to model the form and size of the distortion to infer the rate at which large scale structure grows. We test this hypothesis and assess the performance of current theoretical models for the redshift space distortion using large volume N-body simulations of the gravitational instability process. We simulate competing cosmological models which have identical expansion histories - one is a quintessence dark energy model with a scalar field and the other is a modified gravity model with a time varying gravitational constant - and demonstrate that they do indeed produce different redshift space distortions. This is the first time this approach has been verified using a technique that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
