When are microcircuits well-modeled by maximum entropy methods?
Andrea K. Barreiro, Julijana Gjorgjieva, Fred Rieke, Eric Shea-Brown

TL;DR
This paper investigates when maximum entropy pairwise models accurately describe neural population activity, revealing how input modality, circuit architecture, and coupling influence higher-order interactions.
Contribution
It provides a mechanistic understanding of the conditions under which pairwise maximum entropy models succeed or fail in neural circuits.
Findings
Bimodal inputs lead to larger deviations from pairwise predictions.
Recurrent coupling can amplify higher-order interactions if not too weak or strong.
Retinal circuit data shows weak higher-order effects due to broad unimodal inputs.
Abstract
Describing the collective activity of neural populations is a daunting task: the number of possible patterns grows exponentially with the number of cells, resulting in practically unlimited complexity. Recent empirical studies, however, suggest a vast simplification in how multi-neuron spiking occurs: the activity patterns of some circuits are nearly completely captured by pairwise interactions among neurons. Why are such pairwise models so successful in some instances, but insufficient in others? Here, we study the emergence of higher-order interactions in simple circuits with different architectures and inputs. We quantify the impact of higher-order interactions by comparing the responses of mechanistic circuit models vs. "null" descriptions in which all higher-than-pairwise correlations have been accounted for by lower order statistics, known as pairwise maximum entropy models. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
