Evidence for Low Black Hole Spin and Physically Motivated Accretion Models from Millimeter VLBI Observations of Sagittarius A*
Avery E. Broderick (1), Vincent L. Fish (2), Sheperd S. Doeleman (2),, Abraham Loeb (3) ((1) CITA, (2) MIT Haystack, (3) Harvard)

TL;DR
Millimeter VLBI observations of Sagittarius A* reveal low black hole spin and favor physically motivated accretion models, demonstrating the technique's ability to distinguish between emission models and probe strong gravity effects near the event horizon.
Contribution
This study applies recent mm-VLBI data to test physically motivated accretion models, providing new constraints on black hole spin and emission geometry.
Findings
Physically motivated accretion models fit data better than phenomenological models.
Symmetric flux distribution models are strongly disfavored.
Data suggests a low black hole spin with specific orientation parameters.
Abstract
Millimeter very-long baseline interferometry (mm-VLBI) provides the novel capacity to probe the emission region of a handful of supermassive black holes on sub-horizon scales. For Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, this provides access to the region in the immediate vicinity of the horizon. Broderick et al. (2009) have already shown that by leveraging spectral and polarization information as well as accretion theory, it is possible to extract accretion-model parameters (including black hole spin) from mm-VLBI experiments containing only a handful of telescopes. Here we repeat this analysis with the most recent mm-VLBI data, considering a class of aligned, radiatively inefficient accretion flow (RIAF) models. We find that the combined data set rules out symmetric models for Sgr A*'s flux distribution at the 3.9-sigma level, strongly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
