Criteria for reliable entanglement quantification with finite data
Jun O. S. Yin, Steven J. van Enk

TL;DR
This paper introduces criteria based on Bayesian analysis to determine the number of measurements required for reliable entanglement quantification, demonstrated on four-qubit systems with straightforward extensions.
Contribution
It presents novel Bayesian-based criteria for assessing measurement sufficiency in entanglement quantification, applicable to multi-qubit systems.
Findings
Criteria effectively determine measurement needs for reliable entanglement estimates
Application to four-qubit entanglement demonstrates practical utility
Framework easily generalizes to larger quantum systems
Abstract
We propose one and a half criteria for determining how many measurements are needed to quantify entanglement reliably. We base these criteria on Bayesian analysis of measurement results, and apply our methods to four-qubit entanglement, but generalizations to more qubits are straightforward.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
