Quantitative analysis of the dripping and jetting regimes in co-flowing capillary jets

TL;DR

This study quantitatively analyzes dripping and jetting regimes in co-flowing microfluidic jets, comparing experimental data with theoretical predictions, and examines how external forcing influences these regimes and their stability characteristics.

Contribution

It provides the first quantitative comparison of experimental measurements with theoretical stability predictions for co-flowing liquid jets, highlighting differences in frequency response between dripping and jetting regimes.

Findings

Jetting regime's oscillation frequency aligns with theory

Dripping regime's frequency is insensitive to external forcing

External forcing amplifies jetting frequency but not dripping

Abstract

We study a liquid jet that breaks up into drops in an external co-flowing liquid inside a confining microfluidic geometry. The jet breakup can occur right after the nozzle in a phenomenon named dripping or through the generation of a liquid jet that breaks up a long distance from the nozzle, which is called jetting. Traditionally, these two regimes have been considered to reflect the existence of two kinds of spatiotemporal instabilities of a fluid jet, the dripping regime corresponding to an absolutely unstable jet and the jetting regime to a convectively unstable jet. Here, we present quantitative measurements of the dripping and jetting regimes, both in an unforced and a forced state, and compare these measurements with recent theoretical studies of spatiotemporal instability of a confined liquid jet in a co-flowing liquid. In the unforced state, the frequency of oscillation and breakup of the liquid jet is measured and compared to the theoretical predictions. The dominant frequency of the jet oscillations as a function of the inner flow rate agrees qualitatively with the theoretical predictions in the jetting regime but not in the dripping regime. In the forced state, achieved with periodic laser heating, the dripping regime is found to be insensitive to the perturbation and the frequency of drop formation remains unaltered. The jetting regime, on the contrary, amplifies the externally imposed frequency, which translates in the formation of drops at the frequency imposed by the external forcing. In conclusion, the dripping and jetting regimes are found to exhibit the main features of absolutely and convectively unstable flows respectively, but the frequency selection in the dripping regime is not ruled by the absolute frequency predicted by the stability analysis.