Probing the faint end of the quasar luminosity function at z ~ 4 in the COSMOS field
H. Ikeda, T. Nagao, K. Matsuoka, Y. Taniguchi, Y. Shioya, J. R. Trump,, P. Capak, A. Comastri, M. Enoki, Y. Ideue, Y. Kakazu, A. M. Koekemoer, T., Morokuma, T. Murayama, T. Saito, M. Salvato, E. Schinnerer, N. Z. Scoville,, J. D. Silverman

TL;DR
This study investigates the faint end of the quasar luminosity function at redshift around 4 by identifying low-luminosity quasars in the COSMOS field, revealing a shallower faint-end slope than previous surveys.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of the faint end of the quasar luminosity function at z ~ 4, using deep optical data and spectroscopic follow-up, with detailed completeness analysis.
Findings
Faint-end slope beta = -1.67^{+0.11}_{-0.17} at z ~ 4.
Identification of 8 low-luminosity quasars at z ~ 4.
Results support downsizing evolution of active galactic nuclei.
Abstract
We searched for quasars that are ~ 3 mag fainter than the SDSS quasars in the redshift range 3.7 < z < 4.7 in the COSMOS field to constrain the faint end of the quasar luminosity function. Using optical photometric data, we selected 31 quasar candidates with 22 < i' < 24 at z ~ 4. We obtained optical spectra for most of these candidates using FOCAS on the Subaru telescope, and identified 8 low-luminosity quasars at z ~ 4. In order to derive the quasar luminosity function (QLF) based on our spectroscopic follow-up campaign, we estimated the photometric completeness of our quasar survey through detailed Monte Carlo simulations. Our QLF at z ~ 4 has a much shallower faint-end slope beta = -1.67^{+0.11}_{-0.17} than that obtained by other recent surveys in the same redshift. Our result is consistent with the scenario of downsizing evolution of active galactic nuclei inferred by recent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
