Changing approaches of prosecutors towards juvenile repeated sex-offenders: A Bayesian evaluation

TL;DR

This study uses Bayesian analysis of longitudinal data to evaluate how prosecutors' decisions towards juvenile repeat sex-offenders changed after new mandatory registration policies between 1992 and 1996.

Contribution

It introduces a Bayesian change-point model to analyze judicial decision patterns over time, accounting for youth-specific effects and policy impacts.

Findings

Identifies whether a change-point occurred between 1992 and 1996.

Estimates the effects of the change-point and other factors on prosecutors' decisions.

Provides probabilistic conclusions about the timing and magnitude of decision pattern changes.

Abstract

Existing state-wide data bases on prosecutors' decisions about juvenile offenders are important, yet often un-explored resources for understanding changes in patterns of judicial decisions over time. We investigate the extent and nature of change in judicial behavior toward juveniles following the enactment of a new set of mandatory registration policies between 1992 and 1996 via analyzing the data on prosecutors' decisions of moving forward for youths repeatedly charged with sexual violence in South Carolina. To analyze this longitudinal binary data, we use a random effects logistic regression model via incorporating an unknown change-point year. For convenient physical interpretation, our models allow the proportional odds interpretation of effects of the explanatory variables and the change-point year with and without conditioning on the youth-specific random effects. As a consequence, the effects of the unknown change-point year and other factors can be interpreted as changes in both within youth and population averaged odds of moving forward. Using a Bayesian paradigm, we consider various prior opinions about the unknown year of the change in the pattern of prosecutors' decision. Based on the available data, we make posteriori conclusions about whether a change-point has occurred between 1992 and 1996 (inclusive), evaluate the degree of confidence about the year of change-point, estimate the magnitude of the effects of the change-point and other factors, and investigate other provocative questions about patterns of prosecutors' decisions over time.