TL;DR
This study evaluates 13 decision tree algorithms for star/galaxy classification in SDSS data, finding the Functional Tree algorithm offers superior completeness and low contamination, especially at faint magnitudes, outperforming existing classifiers.
Contribution
The paper systematically compares multiple decision tree algorithms for star/galaxy separation and identifies the Functional Tree as the most effective method.
Findings
Functional Tree achieves 85.2% completeness for 14≤r≤21
FT maintains >80% completeness at r>19 with ~2.5% contamination
FT classifier outperforms SDSS parametric, 2DPHOT, and Ball et al. classifiers
Abstract
We study the star/galaxy classification efficiency of 13 different decision tree algorithms applied to photometric objects in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release Seven (SDSS DR7). Each algorithm is defined by a set of parameters which, when varied, produce different final classification trees. We extensively explore the parameter space of each algorithm, using the set of SDSS objects with spectroscopic data as the training set. The efficiency of star-galaxy separation is measured using the completeness function. We find that the Functional Tree algorithm (FT) yields the best results as measured by the mean completeness in two magnitude intervals: () and (). We compare the performance of the tree generated with the optimal FT configuration to the classifications provided by the SDSS parametric classifier, 2DPHOT and Ball et al.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
