The Origin of [OII] Emission in Recently Quenched AGN Hosts
Dale D. Kocevski, Brian C. Lemaux, Lori M. Lubin, Alice E. Shapley,, Roy R. Gal, and Gordon K. Squires

TL;DR
This study investigates the origin of [OII] emission in AGN host galaxies at z~0.9, revealing that AGN activity, not star formation, predominantly causes the emission, thus challenging its use as a star formation indicator.
Contribution
It demonstrates that [OII] emission in these AGN hosts is mainly due to AGN activity, not star formation, highlighting the need to reconsider [OII] as a star formation tracer in such galaxies.
Findings
Most [OII] emission is AGN-driven, not star formation.
[OII]-based star formation rates overestimate actual activity by five times.
High fraction of post-starburst AGN hosts suggests AGN feedback suppresses star formation.
Abstract
We have employed emission-line diagnostics derived from DEIMOS and NIRSPEC spectroscopy to determine the origin of the [OII] emission line observed in six AGN hosts at z~0.9. These galaxies are a subsample of AGN hosts detected in the Cl1604 supercluster that exhibit strong Balmer absorption lines in their spectra and appear to be in a post-starburst or post-quenched phase, if not for their [OII] emission. Examining the flux ratio of the [NII] to Halpha lines, we find that in five of the six hosts the dominant source of ionizing flux is AGN continuum emission. Furthermore, we find that four of the six galaxies have over twice the [OII] line luminosity that could be generated by star formation processes alone given their Halpha line luminosities. This strongly suggests that AGN-excited narrow-line emission is contaminating the [OII] line flux. A comparison of star formation rates…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
