Evolution of Coordination in Social Networks: A Numerical Study
Marco Tomassini, Enea Pestelacci

TL;DR
This study uses numerical simulations to explore how network structures influence coordination game outcomes, revealing that community clustering promotes socially efficient behaviors and can lead to polarization.
Contribution
It demonstrates through simulations that community structure in social networks enhances the selection of efficient equilibria in coordination games.
Findings
Community clustering promotes efficient social outcomes.
Local network effects can lead to social polarization.
Clustering influences equilibrium selection in coordination games.
Abstract
Coordination games are important to explain efficient and desirable social behavior. Here we study these games by extensive numerical simulation on networked social structures using an evolutionary approach. We show that local network effects may promote selection of efficient equilibria in both pure and general coordination games and may explain social polarization. These results are put into perspective with respect to known theoretical results. The main insight we obtain is that clustering, and especially community structure in social networks has a positive role in promoting socially efficient outcomes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
