The nature of "dark" gamma-ray bursts
J. Greiner, T. Kr\"uhler, S. Klose, P. Afonso, C. Clemens, R. Filgas,, D.H. Hartmann, A. K\"upc\"u Yolda\c{s}, M. Nardini, F.Olivares Estay, A. Rau,, A. Rossi, P. Schady, A. Updike

TL;DR
This study analyzes the fraction and causes of dark gamma-ray bursts using systematic follow-up observations, revealing that 25-40% are dark mainly due to moderate extinction and high redshift effects.
Contribution
It provides the first systematic quantification of dark burst fractions and distinguishes between extinction and high-redshift origins using GROND data.
Findings
25-40% of GRBs are dark depending on the definition
Darkness mainly caused by moderate extinction and high redshift
High detection rate of optical/NIR afterglows within 240 minutes
Abstract
Context: Thirteen years after the discovery of the first afterglows, the nature of dark gamma-ray bursts (GRB) still eludes explanation: while each ng-duration GRB typically has an X-ray afterglow, optical/NIR emission is only seen for 40-60% of them. Aim: Here we use the afterglow detection statistics of the systematic follow-up observations performed with GROND since mid-2007 in order to derive the fraction of "dark bursts" according to different methods, and to distinguish between various scenarios for "dark bursts". Method: Observations were performed with the 7-channel "Gamma-Ray Optical and Near-infrared Detector" (GROND) at the 2.2m MPI/ESO telescope. We used the afterglow detection rate in dependence on the delay time between GRB and the first GROND exposure. Results: For long-duration Swift bursts with a detected X-ray afterglow, we achieve a 90% (35/39) detection rate of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
