Limitations on Cloning in Classical Mechanics
Aaron Fenyes

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that a classical analogue of the quantum no-cloning theorem exists, but classical cloning is possible under a broader definition, with cloning complexity proportional to the object.
Contribution
It introduces a more inclusive definition of classical cloning and proves the minimal complexity required for a cloning machine.
Findings
Classical no-cloning theorem analogous to quantum case
Classical cloning is possible with a broader definition
Cloning machine complexity is at least that of the object
Abstract
In this paper, we show that a result precisely analogous to the traditional quantum no-cloning theorem holds in classical mechanics. This classical no-cloning theorem does not prohibit classical cloning, we argue, because it is based on a too-restrictive definition of cloning. Using a less popular, more inclusive definition of cloning, we give examples of classical cloning processes. We also prove that a cloning machine must be at least as complicated as the object it is supposed to clone.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography
