The energy budget for X-ray to infrared reprocessing in Compton-thin and Compton-thick active galaxies
Tahir Yaqoob (1), Kendrah D. Murphy (2) ((1) JHU, (2) Skidmore, College)

TL;DR
This study uses simulations to show that the mid-infrared to X-ray luminosity ratio is unreliable for determining the column density of obscuring matter in AGNs, due to its sensitivity to factors other than column density.
Contribution
It demonstrates through Monte Carlo simulations that the IR to X-ray luminosity ratio is not a dependable proxy for AGN obscuration levels, challenging previous assumptions.
Findings
Infrared to X-ray luminosity ratio is sensitive to X-ray continuum shape.
Ratio can be high in Compton-thin sources without dust contamination.
Proxy reliability is affected by poorly constrained X-ray continuum and covering factor.
Abstract
Heavily obscured active galactic nuclei (AGNs) play an important role in contributing to the cosmic X-ray background (CXRB). However, the AGNs found in deep X-ray surveys are often too weak to allow direct measurement of the column density of obscuring matter. One method adopted in recent years to identify heavily obscured, Compton-thick AGNs under such circumstances is to use the observed mid-infrared to X-ray luminosity ratio as a proxy for the column density. This is based on the supposition that the amount of energy lost by the illuminating X-ray continuum to the obscuring matter and reprocessed into infrared emission is directly related to the column density and that the proxy is not sensitive to other physical parameters of the system (aside from contamination by dust emission from, for example, star-forming regions). Using Monte Carlo simulations, we find that the energy losses…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
