Reply to the comment on "Loophole-free Bell test for continuous variables via wave and particle correlations"
Se-Wan Ji, Jaewan Kim, Hai-Woong Lee, M. S. Zubairy, and Hyunchul Nha

TL;DR
This paper addresses criticisms of previous work on Bell tests for continuous variables, clarifying issues related to local-hidden-variable models and experimental violations.
Contribution
It provides a detailed response to comments challenging the validity of earlier Bell test results for continuous variables.
Findings
Counter local-hidden-variable model explained
Clarification of issues in Bell test violations
Reinforcement of the original experimental conclusions
Abstract
In a recent note, Cavalcanti and Scarani (CS) constructed a counter local-hidden-variable model to explain the violation of our inequalities in Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 170404 (2010). Here, we briefly discuss some issues in response to the comments raised by CS.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
