Commuting Simplicity and Closure Constraints for 4D Spin Foam Models
Muxin Han, Thomas Thiemann

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new Euclidean Spin Foam Model derived from the Plebanski-Holst path integral with commuting B fields, addressing simplicity constraints and closure issues, and relating it to existing models like FK and Barrett-Crane.
Contribution
It constructs a novel Spin Foam Model using standard discretisation methods from the Plebanski-Holst action with commuting B fields, clarifying the role of closure constraints.
Findings
Model differs from existing ones in handling closure constraints.
Large spin limit relates the model to FK Model.
Non-commutative deformation connects to Barrett-Crane Model.
Abstract
Spin Foam Models are supposed to be discretised path integrals for quantum gravity constructed from the Plebanski-Holst action. The reason for there being several models currently under consideration is that no consensus has been reached for how to implement the simplicity constraints. Indeed, none of these models strictly follows from the original path integral with commuting B fields, rather, by some non standard manipulations one always ends up with non commuting B fields and the simplicity constraints become in fact anomalous which is the source for there being several inequivalent strategies to circumvent the associated problems. In this article, we construct a new Euclidian Spin Foam Model which is constructed by standard methods from the Plebanski-Holst path integral with commuting B fields discretised on a 4D simplicial complex. The resulting model differs from the current ones…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
