The birth rate of subluminous and overluminous type Ia supernovae
Xiangcun Meng, Wencong Chen, Wuming Yang, Zhongmu Li

TL;DR
This study investigates how different treatments of common envelope evolution affect the birth rates and delay times of subluminous and overluminous Type Ia supernovae, revealing that the evolution model significantly influences their occurrence.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the impact of $ ext{alpha}$-formalism and $ ext{gamma}$-algorithm on the birth rates and delay times of peculiar SNe Ia, highlighting the importance of CE treatment.
Findings
Over-luminous SNe Ia may only occur under $ ext{alpha}$-formalism with low CE ejection efficiency.
Sub-luminous SNe Ia from equal-mass DD systems account for less than 1% of all SNe Ia.
The $ ext{gamma}$-algorithm predicts a wider range of delay times, possibly exceeding 15 Gyr.
Abstract
Based on the results of Chen & Li (2009) and Pakmor et al. (2010), we carried out a series of binary population synthesis calculations and considered two treatment of common envelope (CE) evolution, i.e. -formalism and -algorithm. We found that the evolution of birth rate of these peculiar SNe Ia is heavily dependent on how to treat the CE evolution. The over-luminous SNe Ia may only occur for -formalism with low CE ejection efficiency and the delay time of the SNe Ia is between 0.4 and 0.8 Gyr. The upper limit of the contribution rate of the supernovae to all SN Ia is less than 0.3%. The delay time of sub-luminous SNe Ia from equal-mass DD systems is between 0.1 and 0.3 Gyr for -formalism with , while longer than 9 Gyr for . The range of the delay time for -algorithm is very wide, i.e. longer than 0.22 Gyr, even as long as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
