Using GWAS Data to Identify Copy Number Variants Contributing to Common Complex Diseases
Sebastian Z\"ollner, Tanya M. Teslovich

TL;DR
This paper reviews methods for detecting copy number variants (CNVs) in human genomes, compares their effectiveness, especially for rare CNVs, and offers recommendations for identifying CNVs linked to complex diseases.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of CNV detection techniques, compares their power, and introduces alternative approaches for rare CNV identification in disease studies.
Findings
Hybridization intensity-based methods are commonly used for CNV detection.
Tag SNPs are effective for common CNVs but less so for rare variants.
De novo CNV detection methods can outperform case-control studies for disease association.
Abstract
Copy number variants (CNVs) account for more polymorphic base pairs in the human genome than do single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). CNVs encompass genes as well as noncoding DNA, making these polymorphisms good candidates for functional variation. Consequently, most modern genome-wide association studies test CNVs along with SNPs, after inferring copy number status from the data generated by high-throughput genotyping platforms. Here we give an overview of CNV genomics in humans, highlighting patterns that inform methods for identifying CNVs. We describe how genotyping signals are used to identify CNVs and provide an overview of existing statistical models and methods used to infer location and carrier status from such data, especially the most commonly used methods exploring hybridization intensity. We compare the power of such methods with the alternative method of using tag SNPs…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
