The Difference in Narrow Fe K\alpha Line Emission Between Seyfert 1 and Seyfert 2 Galaxies
Teng Liu (1), Jun-Xian Wang (1) ((1) Department of Astronomy,, University of Science, Technology of China)

TL;DR
This study compares the narrow Fe Kalpha line emission between Seyfert 1 and Seyfert 2 galaxies, revealing anisotropy and the need for correction factors to use the line as an intrinsic AGN luminosity indicator.
Contribution
It provides the first observational evidence of anisotropic narrow Fe Kalpha emission and discusses implications for AGN unification models and torus structure.
Findings
Seyfert 2 galaxies have significantly weaker Fe Kalpha lines than Seyfert 1s.
The difference supports anisotropic emission of the Fe Kalpha line.
Results align with models of a clumpy obscuring torus.
Abstract
We compile a sample of 89 Seyfert galaxies with both [OIV] 25.89 um line luminosities observed by Spitzer IRS and X-ray spectra observed by XMM EPIC. Using [OIV] emission as proxy of AGN intrinsic luminosity, we find that although type 2 AGNs have higher line equivalent width, the narrow Fe Kalpha line in Compton-Thin and Compton-Thick Seyfert 2 galaxies are 2.9 +0.8 -0.6 and 5.6 +1.9 -1.4 times weaker in terms of luminosity than Seyfert 1 galaxies respectively. This indicates different correction factors need to be applied for various types of AGNs before the narrow Fe Kalpha line luminosity could serve as intrinsic AGN luminosity indicator. We also find Seyfert 1 galaxies in our sample have on average marginally larger line width and higher line centroid energy, suggesting contamination from highly ionized Fe line or broader line emission from much smaller radius, but this effect is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
