The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is Fatally Flawed
Casey Blood

TL;DR
This paper argues that the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is fundamentally flawed because its linear mathematics cannot explain the probability law, requiring additional mechanisms like collapse or hidden variables.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that the linear mathematics of the many-worlds interpretation cannot account for quantum probabilities, challenging its viability.
Findings
Linear quantum mechanics cannot derive the probability law.
The many-worlds interpretation is incompatible with observed probabilities.
Additional mechanisms are necessary for a complete quantum theory.
Abstract
The linear mathematics of quantum mechanics gives many versions of reality instead of the single version we perceive, with the perceived version chosen at random according to a probability law. Because of these peculiarities, the theory requires an interpretation to be fully understood. Over 50 years ago, Everett proposed in his many-worlds interpretation that these characteristics could be accounted for if the mathematics itself, with no collapse or hidden variables, was carefully analyzed. We show this is incorrect; the linear mathematics cannot account for the probability law. Thus the many-worlds interpretation is not viable. Some mechanism, such as collapse or hidden variables, must be added to obtain a satisfactory understanding of the physical universe.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
