The RAVE Survey: Rich in Very Metal-Poor Stars
Jon P. Fulbright, Rosemary F. G. Wyse, Gregory R. Ruchti, G. F., Gilmore, Eva Grebel, O.~Bienayme, J. Binney, J. Bland-Hawthorn, R. Campbell,, K. C. Freeman, B. K. Gibson, A. Helmi, U. Munari, J. F. Navarro, Q. A., Parker, W. Reid, G. M. Seabroke, A. Siebert, A. Siviero

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that the RAVE survey can efficiently identify very metal-poor stars with [Fe/H] below -2, including some below -4, enabling large statistical analyses without additional high-resolution spectroscopy.
Contribution
The paper introduces a calibration method for RAVE spectra to accurately determine [Fe/H], enabling the identification of very metal-poor stars without extra observations.
Findings
Identified 631 stars with [Fe/H] <= -2 in RAVE data.
Complete sample for stars with [Fe/H] < -2.5.
Discovered three stars with [Fe/H] <= -4.
Abstract
Very metal-poor stars are of obvious importance for many problems in chemical evolution, star formation, and galaxy evolution. Finding complete samples of such stars which are also bright enough to allow high-precision individual analyses is of considerable interest. We demonstrate here that stars with iron abundances [Fe/H] < -2 dex, and down to below -4 dex, can be efficiently identified within the Radial Velocity Experiment (RAVE) survey of bright stars, without requiring additional confirmatory observations. We determine a calibration of the equivalent width of the Calcium triplet lines measured from the RAVE spectra onto true [Fe/H], using high spectral resolution data for a subset of the stars. These RAVE iron abundances are accurate enough to obviate the need for confirmatory higher-resolution spectroscopy. Our initial study has identified 631 stars with [Fe/H] <= -2, from a RAVE…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
