Galaxy stellar mass functions of different morphological types in clusters, and their evolution between z=0.8 and z=0
Benedetta Vulcani (1,2), Bianca M. Poggianti (2), Alfonso, Arag\'on-Salamanca (3), Giovanni Fasano (2), Gregory Rudnick (4), Tiziano, Valentinuzzi (1), Alan Dressler (5), Daniela Bettoni (2), Antonio Cava (6,7),, Mauro D'Onofrio (1), Jacopo Fritz (8), Alessia Moretti (2)

TL;DR
This study examines how galaxy stellar mass functions in clusters evolve from redshift 0.8 to 0, revealing significant growth in certain mass ranges and morphological types, driven mainly by star formation and galaxy infall.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the evolution of galaxy mass functions and morphological distributions in clusters over cosmic time, highlighting the roles of star formation and galaxy infall.
Findings
Mass function at high mass remains unchanged over time.
Significant growth in intermediate-mass galaxies from z=0.8 to 0.
Morphological composition shifts, with more spirals in distant clusters.
Abstract
We present the galaxy stellar mass function (MF) and its evolution in clusters from z~0.8 to the current epoch, based on the WIde-field Nearby Galaxy-cluster Survey (WINGS) (0.04<z<0.07), and the ESO Distant Cluster Survey (EDisCS) (0.4<z <0.8). We investigate the total MF and find it evolves noticeably with redshift. The shape at M*>10^11 M' does not evolve, but below M*~10^10.8 M' the MF at high redshift is flat, while in the Local Universe it flattens out at lower masses. The population of M* = 10^10.2 - 10^10.8 M' galaxies must have grown significantly between z=0.8 and z=0. We analyze the MF of different morphological types (ellipticals, S0s and late-types), and find that also each of them evolves with redshift. All types have proportionally more massive galaxies at high- than at low-z, and the strongest evolution occurs among S0 galaxies. Examining the morphology-mass relation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
