The Dark Side of QSO Formation at High Redshifts
Emilio Romano-Diaz (UK Lexington), Isaac Shlosman (UK Lexington),, Michele Trenti (CASA, CU Boulder), Yehuda Hoffman (Hebrew University,, Jerusalem)

TL;DR
This study uses constrained simulations to compare the expected and observed galaxy counts around high-redshift QSOs, revealing discrepancies that suggest different galaxy formation processes in QSO environments.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed simulation-based analysis of the environment of z~6 QSOs, highlighting differences between predicted and observed galaxy counts and evolution of QSO host halos.
Findings
Predicted about eight galaxies per QSO field, but observations show four.
QSO halos are the most massive at z~6 but not at z~3.
QSO halos do not evolve into the most massive galaxy clusters at z=0.
Abstract
Observed high-redshift QSOs, at z~6, may reside in massive dark matter (DM) halos of more than 10^{12} Msun and are thus expected to be surrounded by overdense regions. In a series of 10 constrained simulations, we have tested the environment of such QSOs. Comparing the computed overdensities with respect to the unconstrained simulations of regions empty of QSOs, assuming there is no bias between the DM and baryon distributions, and invoking an observationally-constrained duty-cycle for Lyman Break Galaxies, we have obtained the galaxy count number for the QSO environment. We find that a clear discrepancy exists between the computed and observed galaxy counts in the Kim et al. (2009) samples. Our simulations predict that on average eight z~6 galaxies per QSO field should have been observed, while Kim et al. detect on average four galaxies per QSO field compared to an average of three…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
