Protein Interaction Networks are Fragile against Random Attacks and Robust against Malicious Attacks
Christian M. Schneider, Roberto F.S. Andrade, Troy Shinbrot, Hans J., Herrmann

TL;DR
This study reveals that protein interaction networks are more fragile against random attacks but more robust against malicious attacks, due to their modular structure, contrasting with other networks like the Internet.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative analysis of protein network robustness, highlighting the contrasting effects of random rewiring and the role of modularity.
Findings
Random rewiring increases protein network robustness.
Protein networks are more fragile than their rewired surrogates.
Modular structure explains the fragility and robustness patterns.
Abstract
The capacity to resist attacks from the environment is crucial to the survival of all organisms. We quantitatively analyze the susceptibility of protein interaction networks of numerous organisms to random and malicious attacks. We find for all organisms studied that random rewiring improves protein network robustness, so that actual networks are more fragile than rewired surrogates. This unexpected fragility contrasts with the behavior of networks such as the Internet, whose robustness decreases with random rewiring. We trace this surprising effect to the modular structure of protein networks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
