Analyzing the success of T-matrix diagrammatic theories in representing a modified Hubbard model

TL;DR

This study systematically evaluates various renormalization schemes in T-matrix approximations for the Hubbard model, comparing results with exact solutions to identify the most effective approaches across different interaction regimes.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive comparison of T-matrix renormalization methods against exact solutions for finite Hubbard clusters, highlighting their strengths and limitations.

Findings

Minimally self-consistent theory works in the atomic limit but not for finite clusters.

Fully renormalized theory performs best in the weak correlation, low-density regime.

Modified Hubbard interaction eliminates Hartree diagrams, improving theoretical accuracy.

Abstract

We present a systematic study of various forms of renormalization that can be applied in the calculation of the self-energy of the Hubbard model within the T-matrix approximation. We compare the exact solutions of the attractive and repulsive Hubbard models, for linear chains of lengths up to eight sites, with all possible taxonomies of the T-matrix approximation. For the attractive Hubbard model, the success of a minimally self-consistent theory found earlier in the atomic limit (Phys. Rev. B 71, 155111 (2005)) is not maintained for finite clusters unless one is in the very strong correlation limit. For the repulsive model, in the weak correlation limit at low electronic densities -- that is, where one would expect a self-consistent T-matrix theory to be adequate -- we find the fully renormalized theory to be most successful. In our studies we employ a modified Hubbard interaction that eliminates all Hartree diagrams, an idea which was proposed earlier (Phys. Rev. B 63, 035104 (2000)).