The lack of intense Lyman~alpha in ultradeep spectra of z=7 candidates in GOODS-S: imprint of reionization?
A. Fontana (1), E. Vanzella (2), L. Pentericci (1), M. Castellano (1),, M. Giavalisco (3), A. Grazian (1), K. Boutsia (1), S. Cristiani (2), M., Dickinson (4), E. Giallongo (1), M. Maiolino (1), A. Moorwood (5), P. Santini, (1) ((1) INAF Rome -Obs, (2) INAF Trieste Obs.

TL;DR
This study uses ultradeep spectroscopy to investigate Lyman-alpha emission in z>6.5 galaxy candidates, finding a lack of intense emission possibly due to reionization effects, which challenges previous trends observed at lower redshifts.
Contribution
It provides the first ultradeep spectroscopic analysis of high-redshift galaxy candidates, suggesting a decline in Lyman-alpha emission potentially caused by reionization.
Findings
Detected a marginal Lyman-alpha emission in one galaxy at z=6.972
Estimated low probability of observing such emission if the trend continued from lower redshifts
Proposed reionization as a possible cause for suppressed Lyman-alpha emission at z>6.5
Abstract
We present ultradeep optical spectroscopy obtained with FORS2 on VLT of seven Lyman-break galaxy (LBG) candidates at z>6.5 selected in the GOODS-S field from Hawk-I/VLT and WFC3/HST imaging. For one galaxy we detect a low significance emission line (S/N< 7), located at 9691.5 +/- 0.5A and with flux 3.4 x 10^(-18)erg/cm^2/s. If identified as Lyman alpha, it places the LBG at redshift z=6.972+/- 0.002, with a rest-frame equivalent width EW}=13A. Using Monte Carlo simulations and conservative EW distribution functions at 2<z<6, we estimate that the probability of observing no galaxies in our data with S/N>10 is ~ 2%, and that of observing only one galaxy out of seven with S/N=5 is ~4%, but these can be as small as ~1E-3, depending on the details of the EW distribution. We conclude that either a significant fraction of the candidates is not at high redshift or that some physical mechanism…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
