Power Spectrum Analysis of Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Decay-Rate Data: Evidence for Solar Rotational Modulation
P.A. Sturrock, J.B. Buncher, E. Fischbach, J.T. Gruenwald, D. Javorsek, II, J.H. Jenkins, R.H. Lee, J.J. Mattes, J.R. Newport

TL;DR
This study finds evidence of solar rotational modulation in nuclear decay rates by analyzing data from PTB and BNL, revealing consistent periodicities around 11.2/yr, suggesting a possible solar influence on nuclear processes.
Contribution
It provides the first combined analysis of PTB and BNL decay data showing a significant peak at ~11.2/yr, indicating solar rotation effects on decay rates.
Findings
Significant peaks at ~11.2/yr in decay data from PTB and BNL.
Combined analysis yields a highly significant peak at 11.23/yr.
Results suggest a possible solar influence on nuclear decay processes.
Abstract
Evidence for an anomalous annual periodicity in certain nuclear decay data has led to speculation concerning a possible solar influence on nuclear processes. We have recently analyzed data concerning the decay rates of Cl-36 and Si-32, acquired at the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), to search for evidence that might be indicative of a process involving solar rotation. Smoothing of the power spectrum by weighted-running-mean analysis leads to a significant peak at frequency 11.18/yr, which is lower than the equatorial synodic rotation rates of the convection and radiative zones. This article concerns measurements of the decay rates of Ra-226 acquired at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) in Germany. We find that a similar (but not identical) analysis yields a significant peak in the PTB dataset at frequency 11.21/yr, and a peak in the BNL dataset at 11.25/yr. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
