Impact of Instrumental Systematics on the CMB Bispectrum
Meng Su, Amit P.S. Yadav, Meir Shimon, Brian G. Keating

TL;DR
This paper investigates how instrumental systematics, especially non-linear responses, impact the estimation of primordial non-Gaussianity in the CMB bispectrum, highlighting potential biases and the importance of calibration.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of linear and non-linear instrumental effects on CMB bispectrum measurements and assesses their impact on primordial non-Gaussianity constraints.
Findings
Non-linear instrument responses can induce spurious non-Gaussian features.
Linear responses mainly distort the bispectrum shape without biasing f_{nl}.
Non-linearities could mimic f_{nl} as large as 10 if not properly calibrated.
Abstract
We study the effects of instrumental systematics on the estimation of primordial non-Gaussianity using the cosmic microwave background (CMB) bispectrum from both the temperature and the polarization anisotropies. For temperature systematics we consider gain fluctuation and beam distortions. For polarization we consider effects related to known instrumental systematics: calibration, pixel rotation, differential gain, pointing, and ellipticity of the instrument beam. We consider these effects at next to leading order, which we refer to as non-linear systematic effects. We find that if the instrumental response is linearly proportional to the received CMB intensity, then only the shape of the primordial CMB bispectrum, if there is any, will be distorted. We show that the nonlinear response of the instrument can in general result in spurious non-Gaussian features on both the CMB temperature…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
