A new look at NICMOS transmission spectroscopy of HD189733, GJ-436 and XO-1: no conclusive evidence for molecular features
Neale P. Gibson (1,2), Frederic Pont (2), Suzanne Aigrain (1,2), ((1) University of Oxford, (2) University of Exeter)

TL;DR
This study re-analyzed archival NICMOS data for three exoplanets, finding that systematic noise removal methods significantly affect the transmission spectra, casting doubt on previous claims of molecular detections.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that linear decorrelation techniques are unreliable for NICMOS transmission spectroscopy, challenging prior molecular detection claims.
Findings
Uncertainties in HD 189733's spectrum are larger than previously reported.
Different data processing methods significantly alter the transmission spectra.
No conclusive evidence for molecular features due to systematic noise effects.
Abstract
We present a re-analysis of archival HST/NICMOS transmission spectroscopy of three exoplanet systems; HD 189733, GJ-436 and XO-1. Detections of several molecules, including H20, CH4 and CO2, have been claimed for HD 189733 and XO-1, but similarly sized features are attributed to systematic noise for GJ-436. The data consist of time-series grism spectra covering a planetary transit. After extracting light curves in independent wavelength channels, we use a linear decorrelation technique account for instrumental systematics (which is becoming standard in the field), and measure the planet-to-star radius ratio as a function of wavelength. For HD 189733, the uncertainties in the transmission spectrum are significantly larger than those previously reported. We also find the transmission spectrum is considerably altered when using different out-of-transit orbits to remove the systematics,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
