mu->e Gamma decay versus mu->eee bound and lepton flavor violating processes in supernova
Oleg Lychkovskiy, Mikhail Vysotsky

TL;DR
This paper investigates how lepton flavor violation in a See-Saw type II model affects supernova physics and predicts observable mu->e gamma decay rates within experimental reach, linking astrophysics with particle physics constraints.
Contribution
It identifies a specific LFV pattern consistent with experimental bounds that influences supernova dynamics and predicts testable mu->e gamma decay rates in upcoming experiments.
Findings
Predicted Br(mu->e gamma) between 0.5*10^(-12) and 6*10^(-12)
LFV processes can significantly modify supernova physics
Constraints on neutrino mixing and tau LFV decays
Abstract
Even tiny lepton flavor violation (LFV) due to some New Physics is able to alter the conditions inside a collapsing supernova core and probably to facilitate the explosion. LFV emerges naturally in a See-Saw type II model of neutrino mass generation. Experimentally LFV is constrained by rare lepton decay searches. In particular, strong bounds are imposed on the mu->eee branching ratio and on the mu-e conversion probability in muonic gold. Currently the mu->e gamma decay is under investigation in the MEG experiment which aims at dramatic increase of sensitivity in the next three years. We search for a See-Saw type II LFV pattern which fits all the experimental constraints, provides Br(mu->e gamma) not less than Br(mu->eee) and ensures a rate of LFV processes in supernova high enough to modify the supernova physics. These requirements are sufficient to eliminate almost all freedom in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
