
TL;DR
This paper investigates the conformal properties of $f(T)$ theories of gravity, revealing they are not dynamically equivalent to scalar-torsion theories via conformal transformation, unlike $f(R)$ theories, and discusses observational constraints.
Contribution
It demonstrates that $f(T)$ theories cannot be transformed into scalar-torsion theories through conformal transformations, highlighting a key difference from $f(R)$ theories.
Findings
$f(T)$ theories are not conformally equivalent to scalar-torsion theories.
An additional scalar-torsion coupling term appears under conformal transformation.
Observational constraints from solar system tests are briefly discussed.
Abstract
It is well-known that theories are dynamically equivalent to a particular class of scalar-tensor theories. In analogy to the extension of the Einstein-Hilbert action of general relativity, theories are generalizations of the action of teleparallel gravity. The field equations are always second order, remarkably simpler than theories. It is interesting to investigate whether theories have the similar conformal features possessed in theories. It is shown, however, that theories are not dynamically equivalent to teleparallel action plus a scalar field via conformal transformation, there appears an additional scalar-torsion coupling term. We discuss briefly what constraint of this coupling term may be put on theories from observations of the solar system.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
