Review of inconsistency of quantum adiabatic theorem
Yong Tao

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the two distinct types of inconsistencies in the quantum adiabatic theorem identified in prior work, emphasizing the importance of correct classification to avoid confusion.
Contribution
It distinguishes and clarifies the two different inconsistency types in the quantum adiabatic theorem, which are often conflated in the literature.
Findings
Identification of two distinct inconsistency types
Clarification of common misconceptions
Improved understanding of quantum adiabatic theorem issues
Abstract
In this paper, we note that there are two different types of inconsistencies of quantum adiabatic theorem in work of K. P. Marzlin and B. C. Sanders [Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 160408, 2004], MS inconsistency and MS counterexample. Nevertheless, these two types are often confused as one by many authors. We shall point out that the inconsistencies of quantum adiabatic theorem raised by the relevant references just can be classified as these two types.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
