Drawbacks of applying perturbative schemes to meson spectroscopy
K. P. Khemchandani, Eef van Beveren, George Rupp

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that perturbative methods in meson spectroscopy can significantly mispredict resonance properties, highlighting the unreliability of such approximations in quark models.
Contribution
It introduces a soluble model for meson interactions and shows that perturbative expansions up to fourth order fail to accurately reproduce resonance poles.
Findings
Perturbative expansions do not match exact resonance poles.
Resonance predictions from perturbation theory are unreliable.
Higher-order corrections do not improve accuracy.
Abstract
We study meson-meson scattering in a soluble model which describes asymptotically free mesons and confined quark-antiquark pairs via coupled channels. Concretely, the two scattered mesons are assumed to interact through s-channel meson-exchange diagrams. Furthermore, we develop a perturbative expansion of the model, and show that the thus found resonance pole positions, including contributions up to fourth order in perturbation theory, completely fail to reproduce the exact results. This shows that the resonance predictions based on perturbative approximations in quark models may be highly unreliable.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
