Primary Beam Shape Calibration from Mosaicked, Interferometric Observations
Charles L. H. Hull, Geoffrey C. Bower, Steve Croft, Peter K. G., Williams, Casey Law, David Whysong

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new method for calibrating the primary beam shape of interferometric radio telescopes using mosaicked observations, which enhances accuracy and efficiency by utilizing science data for calibration.
Contribution
The paper presents an analytical and minimization-based method for primary beam calibration that can be applied to complex beam shapes and improves calibration accuracy by using observational data.
Findings
The method's FWHM estimates are consistent with theoretical and independent measurements.
Calibration accuracy improves with the number of antennas, inversely proportional to uncertainty.
Application to ATA data demonstrates the method's effectiveness and potential for future telescopes.
Abstract
Image quality in mosaicked observations from interferometric radio telescopes is strongly dependent on the accuracy with which the antenna primary beam is calibrated. The next generation of radio telescope arrays such as the Allen Telescope Array (ATA) and the Square Kilometer Array (SKA) have key science goals that involve making large mosaicked observations filled with bright point sources. We present a new method for calibrating the shape of the telescope's mean primary beam that uses the multiple redundant observations of these bright sources in the mosaic. The method has an analytical solution for simple Gaussian beam shapes but can also be applied to more complex beam shapes through minimization. One major benefit of this simple, conceptually clean method is that it makes use of the science data for calibration purposes, thus saving telescope time and improving accuracy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
