Bright X-ray flares from the BL Lac object Mrk 421, detected with MAXI in 2010 January and February

TL;DR

This paper reports the detection and analysis of strong X-ray flares from the blazar Mrk 421 in early 2010 using MAXI, providing insights into the flare characteristics, spectral variations, and physical parameters of the emission region.

Contribution

First detailed analysis of MAXI X-ray flare data from Mrk 421, estimating magnetic fields and emission region sizes during the 2010 flares.

Findings

Maximum fluxes of 120 and 164 mCrab in January and February 2010.

Spectral variation observed during flares, with a convex spectrum near the synchrotron peak.

Estimated magnetic field strength around 0.015 to 0.045 G during the flares.

Abstract

Strong X-ray flares from the blazar Mrk 421 were detected in 2010 January and February through the 7 month monitoring with the MAXI GSC. The maximum 2 -- 10 keV flux in the January and February flares was measured as 120 +- 10 mCrab and 164 +- 17 mCrab respectively; the latter is the highest among those reported from the object. A comparison of the MAXI and Swift BAT data suggests a convex X-ray spectrum with an approximated photon index of about 2. This spectrum is consistent with a picture that MAXI is observing near the synchrotron peak frequency. The source exhibited a spectral variation during these flares, slightly different from those in the previous observations, in which the positive correlation between the flux and hardness was widely reported. By equating the halving decay timescale in the January flare, $t_{\rm d} \sim 2.5 \times 10^{4}$ s, to the synchrotron cooling time, the magnetic field was evaluated as B = 0.045 G $(\delta/10)^{-1/3}$, where $\delta$ is the jet beaming factor. Assuming that the light crossing time of the emission region is shorter than the doubling rise time, $t_{\rm r} \lesssim 2 \times 10^{4}$ s, the region size was roughly estimated as $ R < 6 \times 10^{15}$ cm $(\delta/10)$. These are consistent with the values previously reported. For the February flare, the rise time, $t_{\rm r} < 1.3 \times 10^{5}$ s, gives a loose upper limit on the size as $ R < 4 \times 10^{16}$ cm $(\delta/10)$, although the longer decay time $t_{\rm d} \sim 1.4 \times 10^{5}$ s, indicates B = 0.015 G $(\delta/10)^{-1/3}$, which is weaker than the previous results. This could be reconciled by invoking a scenario that this flare is a superposition of unresolved events with a shorter timescale.