Renormalization group flow, competing phases, and the structure of superconducting gap in multi-band models of Iron based superconductors
Saurabh Maiti, Andrey V. Chubukov

TL;DR
This paper uses analytical renormalization group analysis on multi-band models of iron-based superconductors to explore the competition between magnetic and superconducting orders, revealing conditions favoring superconductivity even at perfect nesting.
Contribution
It extends previous toy models by analyzing more realistic multi-pocket models with angular dependence, discovering new conditions where superconductivity can dominate.
Findings
In multi-pocket models, an attractive s+- interaction component always emerges.
Superconductivity can prevail over SDW order even at perfect nesting in 3-pocket models.
Results align with recent numerical RG studies, confirming the robustness of the findings.
Abstract
We perform an analytical renormalization group (RG) study to address the role of Coulomb repulsion, the competition between extended s-wave superconducting order (s+-) and the spin-density wave (SDW) order and the angular dependence of the superconducting gap in multi-pocket models of Iron based superconductors. Previous analytic RG studies considered a toy model of one hole and one electron pocket. We consider more realistic models of two electron pockets and either two or three hole pockets, and also incorporate the angular dependence of interaction. We neglect for simplicity one of the two hole pockets centered at k=0, which is less nested with electron pockets, i.e., consider 3-pocket and 4-pocket models. In a toy 2-pocket model, SDW order always wins over s+- order at perfect nesting, and s+- order only appears at a finite doping, and only if RG flow extends long enough to overcome…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
